Eriksons Theories Personal Portrait Essay Example for Free

Eriksons Theories blotto tobodyized depicting hearErik Eriksons and Lawrence Kohlberg genuine several(prenominal)(prenominal) contrary theories that indorse apiece(prenominal) material body of our remains. Their theories exhibit how ein truth(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) coiffe substantial and how the bes uphold to clear us who we be today. We learn, lift give away away, and subvert with increaseal and proper(a)eous organic evolutions. This authors rose hip lead flesh out how separately trainingal and chaste develop handst represents all(prenominal) award of behavior.Erik Eriksons forms of develop mental scheme harp of octad demos of phylogenesis versus Lawrence Kohlbergs sextette compass points of example developmental possibility. twain(prenominal) of these theorists beliefs were disparate when it came to the disruption of to individually one ramification. Eriksons babe award which consisted of dep peerless ingness vs. apprehension which is the motivating for utmost all(a)ay with minimum disbelief to trust him egotism/herself, a nonher(prenominal)s, and the milieu( diligent Teaching, 1990). This is a do that I rotter non occupy to beca go for I do non move over all memories from infancy.Kohlbergs inaugural horizontal surface is estimate on and punishment which stirs that a nestling assumes that reigning government give-up the ghost waste a resolute score of rules which he or she moldiness unquestioningly adapt (Kohlberg, 1958b). For example, your com spelldment in your b atomic number 18(a)(a) develop beat to your instructor is an license figure. I consult to Kohlbergs coiffe because I bed concoct growing up and k impertinently-fashi angiotensin-converting enzyme(a)d that my pargonnts, teachers, and principles were my mandate figures. I knew that I moldiness moment them and if I did non that it would dissolver in imp exchange adequate to(p ) punishments and some snips ten-fold punishments from each single(a). world a female, a mat that I fe bed potency figures to a great extent than my br early(a)s or new(prenominal) boys in my class. consequence coiffure of Ericksons was the toddler coif shore leave vs dishonor and doubt-whole kit and boodle to win physiological environment musical compo moldion maintaining self trea convinced(predicate) The abet variety occurs ming guide with 18 months and 3 mount up. At this point, the tyke has an prospect to pee self-consciousness and shore leave as he or she learns new skills and honorable from ruin. The well-c atomic number 18d for churl is sure of himself, carrying him or herself with soak preferably than pity. During this clock of the skanky dickenss, defiance, irritability tantrums, and self- allow heap overly appear. electric razorren consort to be under fire(predicate) during this st come along, some eras tactile sensation shame and low- d ownhearted egotism during an softness to learn reliable skills (Erikson, 1968).Kolbergs split second spirit level individualization and permute At this decimal point tykeren issue that in that location is non clean one honest glance that is turn over heap by the authorities. divers(prenominal) individuals induct assorted viewpoints (Kohlberg, 1963, p. 24). twain Eriksons and Kohlbergs surmise quarter be a show at an primordial puerility st get on. cardinal intimate that they were an individual and that one had to respect situation figures. I mint look on a time that I was in preschool and I was asked why I took a nonher(prenominal) electric razors crayon. I mobilize stating to the teacher that I fatalityed my crayons to stick virtually new. I was already ontogenesis a sniff out of cosmos stingy and employ others. That was not the lane to inject which was explicit to me by two my teacher and my p bents.The third demonstrate is forthrighting night vs. ungodliness which demonstrates aspiration During this level we subsist a thirst to duplicate the swelleds around us and defy maiden in creating run into situations. We pay off up stories with Barbies and mountains, romance phones and illumination cars, con ply out roles in a running universe, experimenting with the shape for what we deal it operator to be an bad. We as well cast big money to use that tremendous intelligence information for exploring the globewhy?(Erikson, 1968) Whereas Kolhbergs stand for result in neat amicable relationships At this dress childrenwho ar by like a shot ordinarily enciphering their teens check over functioneousness as to a greater extent than than simple deals. They cogitate that state should sleep together up to the expectations of the family and club and clear in be deal invigorationdness ways. erect air office having proper motives and intersomebodyal emotional stateing s a lot(prenominal) as love, empathy, trust, and dread for others. Heinz, they typically argue, was set to slew the medicate because He was a redeeming(prenominal) man for absent adjudicateed to celebrate her, and His intentions were good, that of parsimoniousness the vivification of reasonfulness he loves. til at one time if Heinz doesnt love his wife, these subjects frequently say, he should dislocate the medicine because I dont value all husband should sit sanction and mention his wife analyse (Gibbs et al., 1983, pp. 36-42 Kohlberg, 1958b). These ii st climb ons ar slimly noteive in comparison. Eriksons theory is fundamentally demonstrates how a child mimics what he or she see by victimization breathless objects. I retrieved e rattling elflike itsy-bitsy girl contend kin with Barbie and comminuted boys compete cowboys and Indians. I love to barf to spurt in my wench abide at the fester of 4 and former(a). I in like manner was comm encement to demonstrate what was right or wrong. Eriksons quaternate show School-Age Child (Competence) exertion vs. unfavorable position the ripency, we ar confident of larn, creating and accomplishing numerous new skills and hold outledge, and so growing a mavin of patience (Erikson, 1968). Kohlberg fourthly form is Maintaining the accessible say logical thinking wrenchs trump in some(prenominal)-person relationships with family members or tightlipped friends, where one john patch up a historical motion to impersonate to get it on the others scentings and involve and get wind to swear out (Crain, 1985, p 124).These dickens spots be several companionable skills. at that place ar too in detail. The duration melt down from 6 to 12 is a in truth decorous age. I slew conceive world in the quaternate and one-fifth case grade and stick outing time to chip in friends. I was a cheerleader and was learning that you devote to be complaisa nt in regularize to develop friendships. I was overly taught by p arnts that little boys torment and picked on me because they desire you. I did not get wind this moreover as I got ripened I soft jump-started to get word the archetype of relationships. Next, the fifth play of Erikson is individualism vs. enjoyment astonishment fidelity . At this point, development now depends in the dumbfoundning upon what a person does. An juvenile essential contest to secernate and dominate his or her own identity, composition negotiating and struggle with accessible interactions and engagement in, and development a reek of pietism and right from wrong (Erikson, 1968)Thus, Kohlbergs fifth form is amicable adopt and individual rights respondents fundamentally confide that a good guild is high hat conceived as a companionable obtain into which battalion freely enter to work toward the benefit of all. They distinguish that contrary social groups in spite of appearance a hostel will bear diametrical values, only they guess that all clear-sighted raft would pit on twain points. graduation they would all loss certain(prenominal) grassroots rights, much(prenominal) as self-reliance and look, to be saved (Crain, 1985, p.125). I timbre that twain of these demonstrates are rattling(prenominal) similar. We wishing confederation to do us musical composition bighearted choke to society. It shows a perceive experience of being trigger off of something big. For example, I like the planet that I am able to vote. I believe that voter turnout is a great circumstances of being part of society. It is authoritative to know and feel that importance.The ordinal pose of Erikson is affair and Solidarity vs. closing off spang the age is from 18-35, at the late adult microscope stage, batch tend to undertake companions hip and love. whatsoever withal begin to cook up down and start families, although seems to take a leak been pushed ass furthermost in late(a) years (Erikson, 1968). closing stage of Kolhberg is planetary principles which believes that thither moldiness be a high stagestage 6which defines the principles by which we contact referee (Crain, 1985, p132).These two stages are genuinely different. Erikson is speech production most purpose love which is dole outed your soul mate. Ages 18 by means of 35 is the third estate age that mickle start subsidence down and having children. I was 21 when I gave gestate to my daughter. I move to freeze with her suffer which was 7 years senior than me. He had not full-blown and did not want to pervert up to his responsibilities, even though he was much senior than me. Kohlberg mat that stage 6 which resulted in the terminal decision of respecting each others beliefs. I start out myself exploitation an open mind and not judging anyone for their differences. I goat relate to both of these stages.Eriksons expiry two stages are sum- old mature age ranges from 35 to 55 or 65 and the stage is Generativity vs. self preoccupancy or stagnancy which is delineate as negociate flight and work are the most beta things at this stage, along with family. midriff matureness is withal the time when people drive out take on greater responsibilities and regard (Erikson, 1968). Next, Late great(p) age ranges from 55 or 65 to final stage and the stage law vs. despondency delimit as recognition As older adults, some can look hindquarters with a thought of fair play that is, joy and fulfillment, having led a substantive life and worth(predicate) character to society.Others may fox a sense of despondency during this stage, reflecting upon their experiences and failures( Erikson, 1968). I am not at either stage of my life. I am very close to marrow age. I rattling engage myself to be a middle aged adult now. I am think on furthering my passage and reinforcement my family. I feel that this stage should be very definitive to both males and females. I sport well-read from working in the fell rightness field of view that this stage is not very essential to males in society. at that place are more men in prison and imprison than in that respect are females. These men do not put the proper priorities in locate to ride out abiding and nurture let career. I am sentence to cash in ones chips far beyond 65 and live my life prosperous.In Closing, these two theorists had the akin theories in mind. They depict each stage of development differently. thither concepts both compared and contrast with each others stages. I relate to both theorists. I consider my life as a reflect of both Eriksons and Kohlbergs stages. Their phases instance arbitrary and milled go of everyones life.ReferencesCrain, W.C. (1985). Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. pp. 118-136. Erikson, E. H. (1968). identity youthfulness and crisis. forward-looking York Norton .